Essay about Should Social Network Sites Be Banned?
2134 WordsFeb 17th, 20109 Pages
“Social Network sites should be banned as they cause a breakdown in real-life communication.” Do you agree?
Social network sites can be defined as web-based services that allow individuals to construct a public or semi-public profile in a bounded system. One can articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection and also view their list of connections and those made by others within the system. The nature of these connections may vary from site to site.
A social network service focuses on building social relations between people who share similar interests or activities. They essentially consist of a profile, the person’s social links and a variety of additional services. Most social network sites provide a means for…show more content…
In this interview, the Archbishop makes the mistake of greatly generalizing the communication that takes place on these sites. He assumed that all people using SNS are only using that form of communication exclusively and are not combining it with others, such as using telephones or conversing face-to-face. This devalues his argument as he talks collectively about the types of people using SNS and does not take into account that many people use them for numerous different reasons. As his argument is solely formed from his involvement with religion, t can be contended that this leads him to form a biased view of SNS, not taking into account the great benefits of using these sites and only focusing on the negatives.
Another argument that the Archbishop puts forward is the idea that in using SNS, members form ‘transient relationships’, so that when the friendships collapse, people are left feeling desolate. It is not quite clear how the Archbishop has come to form this opinion, as the only evidence he has employed is the recent suicide of the school girl, Megan Gilligan. Although this one incident of suicide has provoked a substantial amount of media attention and deep emotions, it is not extensive enough to form such a strong opinion of SNS. In fact, very few people using SNS have committed suicide with the cause attributed to SNS.
One issue that is frequently
Well, if you are talking about how it SHOULD be banned, you can elaborate on some of the following:
-It wastes a lot of time
-Why do you need to be on a social network with friends you can see every day?
-It is better, and healthier, to communicate with other individuals in real life, not over the computer
-People put up pictures of themselves drinking and doing other inappropriate things, and this can be a turn-off for colleges and certain jobs
If you are talking about how it SHOULD NOT be banned, you can elaborate on some of the following:
-It is a good way to keep connected with people you do not normally get to see, such as family, distant friends, etc.
-It is a good way to reconnect with people who you have lost connection with, such as old school friends, etc.
-It is a good way of sharing your experiences with your friends
-It allows you to share interests, plan events, invite people to and inform people of events, etc.
When debating, you should look at both sides of the situation, and whichever you choose to defend, look at what your opponents might say. How could you respond? How could you fight back? Good luck with your debate!