Is the Death Penalty Effective?
Only just a few months ago, America witnessed two bungled executions in Oklahoma and Ohio. These events have elicited further soul-searching amongst Americans about whether or not the death penalty is effective. There is need to have a sober conversation regarding the death penalty, one that casts aside both anecdotal and emotional arguments in favor of clear-eyed analysis.
The death penalty is not fair. From a pro-life perspective, the death penalty is at odds with a culture that holds in high esteem the gift of life. Capital punishment amounts to state-sponsored murder, which can claim the innocent lives of people. Indeed, capital punishment has claimed a number of innocent lives. Studies have shown that by investing more time and resources in murder trials, over 5 percent of murder executions may be averted. If that is the case, then it is quite chilling to imagine the number of wrongful executions that have taken place. This is enough to help people take a pause and think about the justice of a death sentence.
The obvious question that needs an answer is whether or not capital punishment works. For a long time, in order to justify their support for the death penalty, supporters have often asserted that capital punishment is a successful control. And for several years, the proof of this claim has either been missing or inconclusive. In fact, in states that allow capital punishment, crime rates are relatively high compared to other states that forbid it. Most murders happen in the heat of passion, so the murderer does not have time to sit down and think against perpetrating the crime because of the fear of the death penalty. With the lack of sufficient proof that capital punishment reduces crime, serious questions need to be asked regarding America’s commitment to capital punishment.Another question is whether or not capital punishment is cost-effective. Obviously, the answer is negative. Death penalty cases can amount to over $ 1 million compared to trials where a life sentence without parole is being called for. The cost of executing a murder convict can surpass the cost of accommodating the prisoner for the whole of their life sentence. In some states, a capital trial can economically ruin a county. In Washington State, criminal justice expenses take up 8% of the county budget expenditures, and administrators often worry about the economic ruin a death sentence trial might cause. As if that is not enough, states fund the death penalty irrespective of whether they apply it or not. For example, in New Jersey State, before eradicating it, taxpayers spent over quarter-billion dollars on a death penalty system, which in more than 23 years, killed not even a single person. Any person who is pro-life and financially responsible is obviously at loggerheads with the death penalty. However, even with the overwhelming proof that capital punishment is neither effective nor fiscally sound, it is saddening that it still receives support from other quarters. Of course, proponents of the death penalty system argue on the basis of ‘an eye for an eye’ and also claim that heinous crimes can only be punished by harsh punishments. However, casting anecdotes and emotions aside, it is important to query those unwavering beliefs regarding the death penalty. In the end, pro-life supporters and economists should be on the front line to eradicate capital punishment.
Essay writing help
We have built the ultimate resource for high school and college essay writing. Our manuals will help you write:
- Narrative essays
- Descriptive essays
- Expository essays
- Informative essays
- Persuasive essays
College writing guides
For college or university student, we have built an immense amount of tips for these written assignments:
- Reaction/Response papers
- Position papers
- Research papers
Is the Death Penalty a Deterrent to Future Crimes?
The most heinous of crimes are subject to the highest form of punishment – death penalty. Capital punishment has its share of supporters who believe in the merits of death penalty in fighting crime. On the other side of the coin are those who view the punishment as unconstitutional, barbaric, and just plain cruel. With the spate of mass shootings in the US, the issue of death penalty has had a resurgence in everyone’s consciousness. Many believe that the perpetrators deserve maximum penalty and the highest condemnation of all. This is clearly an emotional response, but it raises the question of whether death penalty is an effective way to deter prospective criminals. This essay aims to show two sides of the issue and argue that death penalty does not necessarily deter criminals from committing future crimes.
The main argument in support of death penalty is its perceived deterrent effect. In his study on deterrence in support of death penalty, van den Haag (1969) acknowledges that even though statistical results are inconclusive, capital punishment is likely to deter people from committing crimes because of fear of death, and more so if it is a death ordered by law. He states that death penalty permanently incapacitates the offender from committing future crimes. He highlights that it is the most feared form of punishment and because of its finality, it could deter prospective murderers who are not deterred by long-term imprisonment. He also puts more weight on saving the lives of prospective victims rather than preserving the lives of convicted murderers who may re-offend.
Decades after van den Haag’s study, Mocan and Gittings (2003) confirm that the death penalty has a deterrent effect. Based on their two controversial studies, they conclude that for each execution, five murders are prevented. Conversely, one commutation results in five murders. Further, Zimmerman’s (2004) research study using state-level data concludes that each execution results in 14 fewer murders. While statistics appear to strengthen the argument in favor of death penalty, they are just numbers that do not support actual crime rates. Anti-death penalty proponents offer numerous reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, including its perceived unconstitutionality and violation of human rights (Oggletree & Sarat, 2009). However, the strongest arguments are those that criticized the studies for their faulty methodologies, insufficient data and flawed assumptions (Liptak, 2007).
Save Your Time with JetWriters
Get high quality custom written essay just for $10
The studies attempt to link executions with murder rate changes over time. They ask whether executions made a difference in the crime rate at a given period. While this is a valid research question, studies fail to take into account other variables that have direct effect on crime rate such as the effectiveness of the judicial system, demographic changes, and economic conditions. With that said, the idea that death penalty can be implemented without biases is completely misguided (Ogletree & Sarat, 2009). Critics add that the findings are skewed by data from a few jurisdictions, largely from Texas, hence, it is not representative of national data (Liptak, 2007). With so few actual executions, the data is thin and conclusions derived from it are considered weak and misleading.
In conclusion, it would be safe to say that there is no clear and indisputable evidence to suggest that the death penalty is an effective means to deter people from committing crimes or murderers from killing again. The ambiguous results of studies make the deterrence argument weak. They are not enough to justify executions. It is surprising how politicians continue to support death penalty instead of looking into more effective and reliable alternatives.
Lindsay, R. A. (2015) The Death Penalty Is Barbaric, Let’s Torture Instead! Capital Punishment and the Supermax Alternative [Online] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ronald-a-lindsay/the-death-penalty-is-barb_b_7215568.html [Accessed December 11, 2015]
Liptak, A. (2007) Does Death Penalty Save Lives? A New Debate [Online] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/18/us/18deter.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all [Accessed December 11, 2015]
Mocan, H. N. and Gittings, R. J. (2003) Getting Off Death Row: Commuted Sentences and the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment, 46 Journal of Law and Economics 453.
Ogletree, C.J. and Sarat, A. (eds.) (2009) The Road to Abolition? The Future of Capital Punishment in the United. New York: New York University Press.
Van den Haag, E. (1969) On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 60(2).
Zimmerman, P. R. (2004) State Executions, Deterrence and ‘the Incidence of Murder. Journal of Applied Economics 163.